Game Development Insights
The discussion highlights the contrasting business models in gaming, emphasizing the viability of live games versus single-player experiences. There's a strong belief in the potential for creative freedom under corporate ownership, particularly with successful acquisitions like Bungie by Sony. The conversation also touches on the unpredictable nature of hit-driven industries, where past successes do not guarantee future outcomes.In this clip
From this podcast
Accidental Tech Podcast
468: You Got Your Non-Money's Worth
Related Questions
So single-player developers and companies like Santa Monica, who create games like "God of War," make a good experience by adding some addictive gameplay or achievements to engage people but not make them too addicted like in multiplayer games, right?
Not all gaming companies are bad for hiring psychologists like Sony, especially when they create single-player games that are highly engaging but within reasonable limits, right?
Do single-player developers like those of God of War, Horizon, Uncharted, Mario, Zelda, or Spider-Man use game design principles to make players addicted or to keep them engaged for a long time? What is the intention and purpose behind this?