206 - Decentralized Science | Brian Armstrong & Patrick Joyce

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Questions from this episode
- Asked by 84 people
- Asked by 39 people
- Asked by 1 person
- Asked by 1 person
Episode Highlights
Flawed Incentives
The current scientific incentive structures are flawed, leading to a culture of risk aversion and incrementalism. highlights how scientists often tailor their research to secure funding rather than pursue groundbreaking ideas, akin to tech startups avoiding risk to ensure funding 1. This results in a lack of innovation and a focus on safe, predictable outcomes. adds that negative results are often hidden due to career concerns, further stifling scientific progress 2.
The end result is that there's a lot of knowledge that's not shared with the world, and it's due to this kind of broken incentive structure.
---
These issues underscore the need for a system that values truth and innovation over mere positive results.
Crypto Solutions
Crypto and blockchain technologies offer potential solutions to the flawed incentive systems in science. suggests that decentralized science (DeSci) can align incentives by rewarding genuine breakthroughs and facilitating open collaboration, similar to open-source software 3. This approach could transform the way scientific contributions are recognized and commercialized. Additionally, discusses incentivizing peer reviews and literature summaries through bounties, allowing scientists to earn rewards for their contributions 4.
Crypto is a tool to align incentives, and the incentives in science are kind of broken.
---
These innovations aim to create a more efficient and equitable scientific ecosystem.
Commercialization
Commercializing scientific breakthroughs remains a challenge, with most research never reaching the market. proposes a system akin to Creative Commons for science, allowing easy licensing of innovations to encourage commercialization 5. This could enable scientists to benefit financially from their discoveries without complex negotiations. also emphasizes the role of private capital in funding research, arguing that it can drive innovation more effectively than traditional government funding 6.
The best companies are based on scientific breakthroughs.
---
Such approaches could unlock the potential of scientific research, turning more discoveries into tangible products.
Related Episodes


91 - Brian Armstrong and The Future of Coinbase
Answers 383 questions

162 - The Coinbase Long Game with Brian Armstrong
Answers 383 questions

63 - The Crypto Renaissance | Josh Rosenthal
Answers 383 questions

200 - Vitalik Buterin's Philosophy: d/acc
Answers 383 questions

Is Crypto a Scam? with Crypto Skeptic Patrick McKenzie
Answers 383 questions

207 - Read. Write. Own. | Chris Dixon
Answers 383 questions

41 - Crypto-Civilization | Balaji Srinivasan
Answers 383 questions

How Crypto Fixes U.S. Debt | Fmr Speaker Paul Ryan
Answers 383 questions

116 - Why Bankless Is Wrong | Ethan Buchman - Cosmos
Answers 383 questions

Tim Beiko & Justin Drake: The Sci-fi Roadmap to Ethereum
Answers 383 questions

SBF vs. Erik Voorhees: How Do We Regulate Crypto?
Answers 383 questions

Part 2: Brian Armstrong, Erik Voorhees, & Ryan Selkis on Binance’s Acquisition of FTX
Answers 383 questions

186 - The Blockchain Trilemma - ETH Vs SOL Vs ATOM with Mike Ippolito
Answers 383 questions

126 - The Crypto Revolution | Josh Rosenthal
Answers 383 questions

156 - Investing in Waves with Chris Burniske
Answers 383 questions
