Unconventional Political Strategies
Ben discusses the moral implications of using extreme measures in politics, emphasizing the importance of maintaining ethical boundaries even when facing formidable opponents like Hillary. He challenges the notion that any means justify the end goal of defeating a political adversary, urging listeners to consider the ethical lines they are willing to cross in the pursuit of victory.In this clip
From this podcast
The Ben Shapiro Show
Carry On, My Wayward Son | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 338
Related Questions
I have a question about the episode Hillary’s Back | Ep. 494 and the clip Hillary's Controversial Remarks. Is the perspective that Democrats are less open to thinking valid for both sides? Additionally, your guest should know that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, so she was popular. Would Bernie Sanders have won? In my opinion, your guest seems to be an ashamed Republican who can't support Trump but won't align with the Democrats.
I have a question about the episode Ben Shapiro vs Destiny Debate: Politics, Jan 6, Israel, Ukraine & Wokeism | Lex Fridman Podcast #410 and the clip Divisiveness in Politics. Is the perspective that Democrats are less open to thinking valid for both sides? Additionally, your guest should know that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, so she was popular. Would Bernie Sanders have won? In my opinion, your guest seems to be an ashamed Republican who can't support Trump but won't align with the Democrats.
I have a question about the episode Ben Shapiro vs Destiny Debate: Politics, Jan 6, Israel, Ukraine & Wokeism | Lex Fridman Podcast #410 and the clip Divisiveness in Politics. Is the perspective that Democrats are less open to thinking valid for both sides?