Disney Erases Tinker Bell

Merit vs. Victimhood

In today's society, two contrasting visions are emerging: one based on merit and the other on victimhood. Ben Shapiro argues that a merit-based society fosters positive externalities by rewarding individuals for their skills and contributions, ultimately benefiting everyone 1. He contrasts this with a victimhood-based society, where success is overshadowed by grievances, leading to negative outcomes 1. Shapiro highlights recent actions by UNC Chapel Hill's board to shift funds from diversity initiatives to public safety, reflecting a pushback against the victimhood narrative 2.

The meritocracy is the only system ever devised by man that actually creates positive effect, positive knock on effect for everyone else in a society.

--- Ben Shapiro

This shift is seen as a move towards reinforcing meritocracy, despite opposition from those benefiting from diversity and inclusion efforts 2.

   

Meritocracy vs. Equity

The debate between meritocracy and equity continues to shape political landscapes. Shapiro criticizes the equity approach, which he claims equates disparities with discrimination, arguing that it undermines merit-based success 3. He points out that many Americans prefer systems where effort and innovation are rewarded, a sentiment reflected in declining support for leaders who prioritize equity over merit 3.

Equity is the lie, again, that all disparities are equivalent to discrimination.

--- Ben Shapiro

Cultural shifts, such as Disney's decision to remove Tinkerbell from meet and greets, illustrate how educational content can influence societal values. Shapiro suggests that these changes promote a victimhood mindset by altering traditional narratives and characters to avoid perceived negative stereotypes 4.