Published Dec 1, 2017

A Grave Injustice In California | Ep. 428

Ben Shapiro delves into the controversial acquittal in the Kate Steinle case, sparking discussions on immigration and border security while dissecting tax reform, the Flynn investigation, and potential government shutdowns. He also scrutinizes cultural issues like net neutrality's impact on competition and conservative viewpoints on charity, offering guidance on children's tech use.
Episode Highlights
The Ben Shapiro Show logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Incident Details

    The shooting incident involving Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier is surrounded by controversy and conflicting narratives. highlights the defense's claim that the shooting was accidental, as the bullet ricocheted off the concrete before hitting Steinle 1. The gun, a Sig Sauer, was reportedly stolen from a federal agent's car days before the incident, raising questions about how it ended up in the hands of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, an illegal immigrant with a criminal record 2. Shapiro questions the plausibility of the defense's argument, noting the improbability of finding a gun wrapped in a cloth on a public pier 1.

    The idea that this happens in San Francisco on a regular basis is insane.

    ---

    The defense also argued that the gun had a propensity to accidentally fire, but Shapiro emphasizes that handling a gun near people with a finger on the trigger is not a mere accident 2.

       

    Legal Considerations

    The legal proceedings in the Kate Steinle case have sparked debate over the charges and the jury's decision. Shapiro argues that the prosecution's decision to charge Garcia Zarate with second-degree murder was an overreach, suggesting that involuntary manslaughter would have been more appropriate given the circumstances 3. He explains that involuntary manslaughter in California involves reckless disregard for human life without intent to kill, which aligns more closely with the evidence presented 4.

    The jury also could have found for involuntary manslaughter. That was on the table as well.

    ---

    Shapiro criticizes the prosecution for failing to press the charges properly, which may have influenced the jury's verdict 4.

       

    Immigration Policy

    The case has intensified discussions on immigration policies and sanctuary cities. Shapiro argues that Garcia Zarate should not have been in the U.S. due to his repeated deportations and criminal record, highlighting the role of sanctuary cities in his release 5. He suggests that the incident underscores the need for stricter immigration controls and border security, aligning with President Trump's call for a wall 6.

    The reason this is a political issue is cause this bastard never should have been in the United States in the first place.

    ---

    Shapiro believes that the case exemplifies the risks posed by sanctuary cities and advocates for federal action to prioritize public safety over protecting criminal aliens 5.

Related Episodes