Published Oct 24, 2019

The Poop-Flinging Begins | Ep. 882

Ben Shapiro delves into the contentious debates surrounding Big Tech's role in information management, Jerusalem's pivotal significance, and the political intricacies of the impeachment inquiry against President Trump, scrutinizing power dynamics and the implications for free speech and global governance.
Episode Highlights
The Ben Shapiro Show logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Historical Roots

    Jerusalem holds a profound historical and religious significance, serving as a cornerstone for Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. emphasizes the city's dual heritage, rooted in both Greek rationality and faith-based values, which have shaped Western civilization 1. He highlights the Western Wall's symbolic importance, despite it being merely a retaining wall for the Temple Mount, the true holiest site in Judaism 2.

    It's sort of like praying at the fence of a parking lot that contains the building that you actually care about.

    ---

    The city's significance extends beyond religion, as it embodies the foundational values of human rights and intellect, deeply influencing Western thought 3.

       

    Control Debate

    The control and potential division of Jerusalem remain contentious issues, with significant implications for religious freedom and geopolitical stability. argues that dividing Jerusalem is impractical and would hinder freedom of worship, as the city is deeply intertwined and lacks clear dividing lines 4. He stresses that Israeli control is crucial for maintaining access to holy sites for all religions, contrasting with the restrictions faced under previous Jordanian rule 5.

    If you actually wish to see freedom of worship, if you wish to see liberalism, and I just mean freedom and openness, then the idea of handing that over to the terrorist Palestinian Authority...is full scale insanity.

    ---

    The notion of dividing the city is likened to giving a terrorist half of one's house, highlighting the complexities and potential dangers of such a proposal 6.