Published Feb 5, 2018

Ep. 648 The Democrats Are Lying About Their Own Lies

Dan Bongino exposes the Democrats' alleged deception in the FISA process and the controversial dossier used to target the Trump campaign, arguing that their shifting narratives and attempts to deflect blame highlight political motivations within the Obama administration.
Episode Highlights
Dan Bongino Show logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Carter Page

    In the unfolding controversy surrounding Carter Page, scrutinizes the legitimacy of the FISA warrant process. He highlights that the warrant for Page was approved only after he left the Trump campaign, raising questions about the narrative of Russian collusion 1. Bongino argues that the Democrats are in panic mode as the memo reveals the Obama administration's spying on Trump, using information funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign 2.

    The Democrats now know they're in trouble because who provided the dossier? Hillary Clinton's team and the Democrat national Committee.

    ---

    He further questions why the FISA warrant was denied when Page was still part of the campaign, suggesting the dossier was used as a key piece of evidence only after Page's departure 3.

       

    Papadopoulos Shift

    The shifting focus to George Papadopoulos is another attempt to redirect the narrative. Bongino points out the absurdity of blaming Papadopoulos for the investigation, given his low-level position and the delayed interview by the FBI 4. He questions the logic of starting a major investigation based on vague claims of Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton, which were already widely known 5.

    The next narrative will be Papadopoulos did it. It was the meeting in the London bar where Papadopoulos said the Russians had dirt on Hillary.

    ---

    Bongino criticizes the narrative switch from Carter Page to Papadopoulos, suggesting it is a cover-up for political motivations behind the Obama administration's actions.

       

    Narrative Collapse

    Bongino argues that the Democrats' conflicting narratives are collapsing under scrutiny. Initially, they claimed the memo was a national security threat, but later dismissed it as insignificant, exposing inconsistencies 6. He emphasizes the danger of using unsubstantiated claims to justify surveillance, warning of the implications for civil liberties 7.

    It's either a catastrophic breach of national security, or it's an absolute nothing burger.

    ---

    Bongino warns that history will judge those who support such narratives as complicit in creating a police state.

Related Episodes