Chevron and Textualism
The discussion delves into the complexities of Chevron deference and its role in shaping the administrative state. Sarah critiques the application of textualism, highlighting its flaws and the misuse of linguistic tools in legal interpretations. The conversation raises critical questions about the balance of power between agencies and the judiciary, emphasizing the potential consequences of eroding Chevron’s foundational principles.In this clip
From this podcast
Decoder with Nilay Patel
The Supreme Court ruling that could kill net neutrality
Related Questions
Can regulatory agencies be burdened as discussed in the episode Richard Epstein on the Constitution and the clip Defects in the Regulatory System? Specifically, how does this relate to the discussions in the episode Arnold Kling on Reforming Government and Expertise and the clip The Intrusive Administrative State, particularly in relation to the SCOTUS curbing regulatory agencies’ powers and the clip Regulatory Powers Impact?
Can regulatory agencies be burdened as discussed in the episode SCOTUS curbs regulatory agencies’ powers. Again. and the clip Regulatory Powers Impact?
Can regulatory agencies be burdened as discussed in the episode Richard Epstein on the Constitution and the clip The Administrative State from the episode SCOTUS curbs regulatory agencies’ powers. Again.?