Chevron and Textualism
The discussion delves into the complexities of Chevron deference and its role in shaping the administrative state. Sarah critiques the application of textualism, highlighting its flaws and the misuse of linguistic tools in legal interpretations. The conversation raises critical questions about the balance of power between agencies and the judiciary, emphasizing the potential consequences of eroding Chevron’s foundational principles.In this clip
From this podcast
Decoder with Nilay Patel
The Supreme Court ruling that could kill net neutrality
Related Questions