The videos that don’t work on YouTube and the future of the creator business, with Nebula CEO Dave Wiskus

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Episode Highlights
Nebula's Approach
explains that Nebula is not a YouTube competitor but rather an "expansion pack" that offers creators a platform to post content without ads. This allows for a more premium experience, akin to Netflix or Apple TV, where creators can share original productions and exclusives that might not fit on YouTube 1. The platform emerged from a need to provide creators with more control and financial stability, avoiding the pitfalls of previous ventures like Vessel, which failed after being acquired by Verizon 2. Wiskus emphasizes the importance of maintaining operational costs low to ensure Nebula's sustainability, even if it means a slow decline rather than a sudden collapse 2.
We're more like an expansion pack to YouTube. It's not education content, but education-ish, like the kinds of things you would watch on YouTube.
---
Creator Power
Platforms like Standard and Nebula empower creators by offering them more control over their content and revenue streams. highlights that Standard's exclusivity agreements with creators ensure that sponsors must adhere to their terms, thus empowering creators rather than extracting value from them 3. This model contrasts with traditional media networks, where creators often have less leverage. Nebula provides an alternative revenue model, allowing creators to post content that YouTube might not monetize, thereby offering a more sustainable platform for creators 4.
The creators that we represent, we represent exclusively. So for the folks on our roster, if you want to do deals with them, you have to go through us.
---
Monetization
Creators face significant monetization challenges on platforms like YouTube, where content can be demonetized or age-restricted. shares an example of a series on Nebula that would not have been financially viable on YouTube due to its sensitive content 5. Nebula, however, offers a profitable alternative by leveraging partnerships with platforms like CuriosityStream, which helps creators earn through bundled subscriptions 5. This approach not only provides financial stability but also fosters a more authentic creator-audience relationship, as creators are not bound by restrictive ad-driven models 6.
Those videos on YouTube would be demonetized. They would be age restricted. They would not make money.
---
Related Episodes


Why Hank Green can’t quit YouTube for TikTok
Answers 383 questions

Recode Decode: Susan Wojcicki, CEO, YouTube
Answers 383 questions

Everyone knows what YouTube is. Few know how it really works.
Answers 383 questions

Patreon CEO Jack Conte on why creators can’t depend on platforms
Answers 383 questions

Recode Decode: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki (Live at Code Media 2018)
Answers 383 questions

The quirks and features of YouTube car reviews with Doug DeMuro
Answers 383 questions

Recode Decode: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki
Answers 383 questions

NBCU's streaming chief isn't worried about you canceling cable
Answers 383 questions

The next generation of startups is remote, with Y Combinator's Michael Siebel
Answers 383 questions

Marques Brownlee on how to scale MKBHD while being the face of the YouTube brand
Answers 383 questions

Recode Decode: Box CEO Aaron Levie
Answers 383 questions

Platformer’s Casey Newton on surviving the great media collapse and what comes next
Answers 383 questions

Chris Dixon thinks web3 is the future of the internet. Is it?
Answers 383 questions

Disney just fought off a shareholder revolt — but the clock’s still ticking
Answers 383 questions
