Published Dec 7, 2021

From a meme to $47 million: ConstitutionDAO, crypto, and the future of crowdfunding

Explore the audacious journey of ConstitutionDAO, where the intersection of decentralized governance and high-stakes bidding for a rare U.S. Constitution copy unveils challenges in regulation, smart contract execution, and community trust during a $47 million crypto crowdfunding saga.
Episode Highlights
Decoder with Nilay Patel logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Bidding Thrills

    The ConstitutionDAO's attempt to purchase a rare copy of the U.S. Constitution was a thrilling experience for those involved. described the auction as an intense event, filled with excitement and anxiety as the bidding numbers climbed. Despite their loss, the team felt a sense of accomplishment for bringing attention to DAOs and crypto technology 1. They had to verify their $43 million bid with Sotheby's, who required a reserve for taxes and fees, which ultimately led to their bid being slightly outdone by billionaire Ken Griffin 2. Erlich expressed hope that Griffin would engage with the DAO's mission, stating, "I want to wish Ken also a congratulations. I know he has some really great plans to display the document and make it so people are able to see it and engage with it."

       

    Post-Auction Confusion

    Following the auction, there was significant confusion and miscommunication, particularly on social media. explained that some people mistakenly believed ConstitutionDAO had won, leading to premature celebrations online 3. The team had to clarify the situation, emphasizing that they were waiting for official confirmation from Sotheby's before making any announcements. Erlich noted the importance of the technology narrative, saying, "All great technology exists for one reason, and it's to enable people," highlighting the potential of DAOs to drive innovation 4.

       

    Unmet Goals

    The aftermath of the auction left the ConstitutionDAO team reflecting on their unmet expectations and the challenges they faced. acknowledged the disappointment but also saw the event as a learning opportunity for the DAO community 1. He discussed the regulatory and technological hurdles of managing funds and ownership through a DAO, noting the lack of clear legal frameworks for such entities 5. Erlich admitted, "The third party that I just have to trust... there's no software contract or standard legal contract that I can look at," underscoring the complexity of integrating DAOs with traditional systems.

Related Episodes