Evaluating Scientific Progress
Yann discusses the need for a more predictive evaluation system for scientific papers, suggesting that reputation should reflect the success of reviews. He expresses disappointment at the lack of innovation in current peer review processes, emphasizing that the pursuit of fairness often hampers scientific advancement. Despite efforts like open reviews, biases persist, raising questions about the effectiveness of double-blind reviews in achieving true fairness.In this clip
From this podcast
Lex Fridman Podcast
Yann LeCun: Dark Matter of Intelligence and Self-Supervised Learning | Lex Fridman Podcast #258
Related Questions