Linda reveals that people's acceptance of Supreme Court rulings often hinges on their personal moral convictions, leading them to view the Court as legitimate only when they agree with its decisions. This phenomenon extends to various public life scenarios, where individuals may justify extreme measures, like vigilante justice, if it aligns with their beliefs. The discussion also touches on the political maneuvering surrounding Supreme Court nominations, illustrating how moral and procedural fairness can be selectively perceived based on one's stance.
