Published Feb 25, 2015

Episode #051 ... David Hume pt. 1

Explore David Hume's revolutionary ideas as Stephen West delves into the 'is versus ought' problem, the limitations of science in moral guidance, and the debates on causality that challenge traditional views on the universe's origins, underscoring the essential role of philosophy in ethical discourse.

Episode Highlights

Topics covered

Science and Ethics
01
Is vs. Ought Problem
02
Causality Debates
03

Episode #051 ... David Hume pt. 1

Topics covered

Popular Clips

Cosmological Argument Critique

Causality Unraveled

Science and Morality

Hume's Timeless Brilliance

Cause and Effect

Is vs. Ought

Cause and Effect

Assumptions and Origins

Blind Inferences Explored

Causes and Change

Ethics Beyond Science

Is vs. Ought

Hume's Critique of Religion

Episode Highlights

Science and Ethics

Is vs. Ought Problem

Causality Debates

Episode #051 ... David Hume pt. 1

Topics covered

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

Science and EthicsStephen West examines the limitations of science in providing moral guidance and argues for philosophy, rather than religion, to fill this ethical gap. He draws on David Hume's critique of religion and highlights the importance of understanding science's true capabilities.

Science and Ethics

Is vs. Ought ProblemStephen West explores David Hume's 'is versus ought' distinction, a pivotal concept in ethics that challenges the logical leap from facts to values. This episode examines how this fallacy manifests in everyday reasoning and its implications for modern discourse.

Is vs. Ought Problem

Causality DebatesDavid Hume's critique of the cosmological argument and assumptions in causality challenges traditional views on the universe's origins. His insights encourage critical thinking about the assumptions we make regarding cause and effect.

Causality Debates