Global Governance Debate
Ahmad raises the provocative idea that a single world government could potentially eliminate wars, while Jacob counters with concerns about totalitarian control and the concentration of power. They discuss the historical context of wars and the motivations behind them, suggesting that the same power dynamics persist regardless of the system in place. The conversation delves into the necessity of perceived threats, like UFOs or global warming, to unify people under a larger governing body.In this clip
From this podcast
Doc Malik
#156 - Rockefeller: Controlling The Game
Related Questions