#149 - Why Karen Kingston Has A Beef With Pfizer

Legal Immunity

Karen explains that despite common beliefs, Pfizer can be sued, as evidenced by ongoing lawsuits in Texas. She describes how Pfizer's claims of legal immunity have been dismissed by judges, who found their arguments inconceivable. This legal battle highlights the company's attempts to evade responsibility for alleged fraud and criminal experimentation 1.

You can't contract to commit a crime and you can't contract to conduct criminal experimentation on people with a biosynthetic agent that doesn't protect against disease, prevent infection, protect against hospitalization or death.

--- Karen Kingston

The judge's decision to allow other plaintiffs to join the complaint underscores the seriousness of the allegations against Pfizer 2.

   

Government Ties

Karen sheds light on the close ties between the government and pharmaceutical companies, which she believes lead to corruption and lack of accountability. She recounts her own experiences in the industry, where dissenting voices are often silenced to maintain a corporate consensus 3. This environment fosters unethical practices and suppresses critical information.

If you don't come to consensus with the group or you just constantly bring up problems with no solution and create chaos, eventually you literally lose speaking privileges in the group and you end up being terminated.

--- Karen Kingston

Karen also mentions the broader implications of these ties, suggesting that the pharmaceutical industry's influence extends to regulatory bodies and even the government 4.

   

Suppression

The discussion also covers how the pharmaceutical industry has actively suppressed information about the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Karen reveals that Pfizer recorded nearly 5 million serious adverse events, yet this information was not adequately disclosed to the public 5. She emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in reporting these adverse effects.

Pfizer recorded nearly 5 million serious adverse events across 1.5 million people. That means about each person had three or four or more adverse events.

--- Karen Kingston

This suppression of truth has significant implications for public health and trust in the pharmaceutical industry 6.