Challenging Medical Evidence
Jacob Stegenga discusses the limitations of relying solely on randomized control trials as the gold standard in evidence based medicine. He explores the biases present in other forms of evidence and raises the question of whether first person reports should be considered when evaluating the benefits and harms of medical interventions.In this clip
From this podcast

EconTalk
Jacob Stegenga on Medical Nihilism
Related Questions
What is the importance of well-controlled trials in the context of the episode Jacob Stegenga on Medical Nihilism and the clip Weighing Benefits and Harms?
What do experts say about SSRI effectiveness in the episode 424: We may need to reconsider the power of antidepressants | Internal medicine doctor Austin Perlmutter, M.D. and the clip SSRIs and Effectiveness?
What are expert opinions on SSRIs?