John Kay and Mervyn King on Radical Uncertainty

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Episode Highlights
Models as Puzzles
Economic models often resemble puzzles that provide insights but fail to capture the complexity of the real world. argues that while these models can offer valuable perspectives, they are limited to "small worlds" where assumptions hold true 1. In reality, decisions in government, business, and personal life occur in a "larger world" where such models fall short. He emphasizes the danger of over-relying on models, noting that they are not equipped to provide precise predictions due to their dependence on human behavior parameters 2.
The great danger of the use of models by economists is that they believe that this applies to the whole panoply of human life.
---
Kay's critique highlights the need for broader perspectives in economic decision-making.
  Â
Critique of Predictions
The failure of economic models to predict significant events is a critical issue. points out that these models often rely on assumptions that don't hold up in real-world scenarios, especially during major economic shifts 3. He criticizes the "as if" methodology, which assumes people behave in predictable ways, leading to flawed predictions. adds that cost-benefit analyses often rely on fabricated data, rendering their conclusions meaningless 4.
Whenever economics has tried to make forecasts about the future, the results have been pretty woeful.
---
This critique underscores the limitations of traditional economic forecasting methods.
  Â
Complexity in Economics
Economics is inherently complex, and traditional models often oversimplify this complexity. compares economics to physics, noting that unlike physics, economics cannot easily quantify its variables due to their dynamic nature 5. argues that economists often forget the "as if" nature of models, mistakenly treating them as reality 6. This leads to misguided policy recommendations based on flawed assumptions.
Life is not an optimization problem, and we'd like to think it is sometimes.
---
The discussion calls for a reevaluation of how economic models are used in understanding human behavior.
Related Episodes


Lars Peter Hansen on Risk, Ambiguity, and Measurement
Answers 383 questions

Robert Pindyck on Averting and Adapting to Climate Change
Answers 383 questions

Vernon Smith on Rationality in Economics
Answers 383 questions

Robert Pindyck on Climate Change
Answers 383 questions

John Cochrane on the Financial Crisis
Answers 383 questions

Robert Burton on Being Certain
Answers 383 questions

John Quiggin on Zombie Economics
Answers 383 questions

William Byers on the Blind Spot, Science, and Uncertainty
Answers 383 questions

If Life Is Random, Is It Meaningless? (with Brian Klaas)
Answers 383 questions

Justin Fox on the Rationality of Markets
Answers 383 questions

John Cochrane on Economic Growth and Changing the Policy Debate
Answers 383 questions

Russ Roberts (and Robin Hanson) on Truth and Economics
Answers 383 questions

Michael Munger on Private vs. Public Risk-Taking
Answers 383 questions

John Taylor on Fiscal and Monetary Policy
Answers 383 questions

Maeve Cohen on Rethinking Economics
Answers 383 questions
