David Schmidtz on Rawls, Nozick, and Justice

Moral Duty

The ethical implications of Rawls and Nozick's ideas on moral responsibility are profound. David Schmidtz reflects on Nozick's stance on voluntary slavery, highlighting the symbolic value of what a country stands for. He argues that even if selling oneself into slavery could save a loved one, it contradicts the principle of freedom that a nation should uphold 1. Schmidtz concludes that such contracts are unconscionable and unenforceable, emphasizing the importance of moral duties over individual choices 2.

   

Power Dynamics

Power dynamics and corruption are central themes in the philosophical discourse on justice. Schmidtz discusses the age-old adage that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely," noting its relevance in modern political systems 3. He explains how the accumulation of power often leads to corruption, as individuals and entities seek to acquire and exploit it for personal gain. This dynamic is evident in historical examples, such as King Leopold of Belgium, who acted with impunity when unrestrained by checks and balances 4.

   

Philosophical Challenges

Rawls and Nozick challenge classical philosophical traditions by reshaping ideas about justice and equality. Schmidtz critiques Rawls' approach to distributing resources, arguing that it fails to adequately respect individual talents and contributions 5. He also recounts Nozick's personal journey, highlighting his departure from strict libertarianism due to moral considerations, particularly regarding slavery 6. This evolution in thought reflects a broader questioning of traditional theories in light of ethical complexities.