Published Feb 13, 2023

Adam Mastroianni on Peer Review and the Academic Kitchen

Adam Mastroianni challenges the traditional norms of academic publishing and peer review, advocating for a more transparent and impactful approach to sharing scientific research. He critiques the inefficiencies and historical failures of peer review, calling for a reform that enhances transparency and accessibility in disseminating knowledge.

Episode Highlights

Topics covered

Episode Highlights

Related Episodes

Adam Mastroianni on the Brain, the Ears, and How We Learn
Answers 383 questions
Adam Mastroianni on Learning and Mostly Forgetting
Answers 383 questions
Adam Ozimek on the Power of Econometrics and Data
Answers 383 questions
Ed Yong on Science, Replication, and Journalism
Answers 383 questions
Brian Nosek on Truth, Science, and Academic Incentives
Answers 383 questions
Adam D'Angelo on Knowledge, Experimentation, and Quora
Answers 383 questions
Adam Cifu on Ending Medical Reversal
Answers 383 questions
Noah Smith on Whether Economics is a Science
Answers 383 questions
Ariel Rubinstein on Game Theory and Behavioral Economics
Answers 383 questions
James Heckman on Facts, Evidence, and the State of Econometrics
Answers 383 questions
A User's Guide to Our Emotional Thermostat (with Adam Mastroianni)
Answers 383 questions
Dan Klein on Truth, Bias, and Disagreement
Answers 383 questions
Adam Cifu on the Case for Being a Medical Conservative
Answers 383 questions
Binyamin Appelbaum on the Economists' Hour
Answers 383 questions
Alex Tabarrok on Innovation
Answers 383 questions

Dexa/Russ Roberts

Adam Mastroianni on Peer Review and the Academic Kitchen

Topics covered

Popular Clips

Evolution of Scientific Journals

Rethinking Scientific Peer Review

The Frustrations of Publishing

Rethinking Peer Review

Academic Freedom

Illusion of Peer Review

The Evolution of Peer Review

Challenging Peer Review

Uncovering Fraud in Scientific Papers

Replicating Results

Embracing Uncertainty

Does Peer Review Work?

The Review Process

Episode Highlights

Vision for Science Reform

Critique of Peer Review

Related Episodes

Adam Mastroianni on the Brain, the Ears, and How We Learn

Adam Mastroianni on Learning and Mostly Forgetting

Adam Ozimek on the Power of Econometrics and Data

Ed Yong on Science, Replication, and Journalism

Brian Nosek on Truth, Science, and Academic Incentives

Adam D'Angelo on Knowledge, Experimentation, and Quora

Adam Cifu on Ending Medical Reversal

Noah Smith on Whether Economics is a Science

Ariel Rubinstein on Game Theory and Behavioral Economics

James Heckman on Facts, Evidence, and the State of Econometrics

A User's Guide to Our Emotional Thermostat (with Adam Mastroianni)

Dan Klein on Truth, Bias, and Disagreement

Adam Cifu on the Case for Being a Medical Conservative

Binyamin Appelbaum on the Economists' Hour

Alex Tabarrok on Innovation

Adam Mastroianni on Peer Review and the Academic Kitchen

Topics covered

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

Vision for Science ReformAdam Mastroianni challenges the traditional academic publishing model, advocating for a more open and impactful approach to sharing scientific research. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accessibility in the dissemination of knowledge.

Vision for Science Reform

Critique of Peer ReviewAdam Mastroianni critiques the peer review process, arguing it fails to ensure scientific accuracy and quality. He discusses its inefficiencies, misconceptions, and historical evolution, advocating for a new approach to academic research.

Critique of Peer Review

Related Episodes