Published Nov 30, 2022

Countries That Have Changed Their Name

Gary Arndt delves into the fascinating reasons and stories behind countries changing their names, examining modern shifts like Türkiye and Eswatini, as well as historical transformations from Persia to Iran. Discover how these changes reflect efforts to reclaim national identity, deep-seated cultural dynamics, and powerful political narratives.
Episode Highlights
Everything Everywhere Daily logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • North Macedonia

    The name change of North Macedonia was driven by historical and diplomatic tensions with Greece. After Yugoslavia's dissolution, Macedonia declared independence, retaining its name, which Greece contested due to historical claims linked to Alexander the Great. This dispute hindered Macedonia's aspirations to join international organizations like NATO. explains the resolution:

    In 2019, the Republic of Macedonia agreed to change its name to North Macedonia, which is a recognition of the Greek province of Macedonia.

    ---

    This compromise allowed North Macedonia to join NATO in 2020, marking a significant diplomatic achievement 1 2.

       

    Czechia

    The transition from the Czech Republic to Czechia reflects a broader trend of simplifying country names for ease of use. Despite official recognition, the name Czechia has struggled to gain popular acceptance, much like Turkey's attempt to rebrand as Türkiye. notes the challenges faced:

    The Czechs have been conducting a campaign to get people to start using Czechia.

    ---

    This effort highlights the complexities involved in rebranding a nation's identity, where historical and cultural factors play significant roles 1 3.

       

    Myanmar

    Myanmar's name change from Burma in 1989 was an attempt by the military government to unify the country's diverse ethnic groups. The name Myanmar is considered more inclusive, yet both names are still used interchangeably today. highlights the political nuances:

    Many countries never officially changed how they refer to the country because they didn’t want to acknowledge the legitimacy of the military government.

    ---

    This dual usage reflects ongoing political and cultural complexities within the nation and internationally 3 4.

Related Episodes