601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying? | Freakonomics Radio

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Questions from this episode
- Asked by 347 people
- Asked by 196 people
- Asked by 116 people
- Asked by 91 people
- Asked by 83 people
- Asked by 74 people
- Asked by 69 people
- Asked by 68 people
- Asked by 68 people
- Asked by 60 people
- Asked by 56 people
- Asked by 55 people
- Asked by 48 people
- Asked by 47 people
- Asked by 39 people
Episode Highlights
Scientific Studies
Scientific studies reveal that multitasking is largely ineffective, even for simple tasks. David Strayer explains that activities like walking and talking can interfere with each other, leading to decreased performance. He notes that multitasking in high-stakes environments, such as medical settings, can result in critical errors 1. Olivia Grace shares her experience with a multitasking test, emphasizing that prioritizing tasks is more effective than attempting to multitask 2.
As soon as you start to multitask, performance on both of the tasks start to degrade.
--- David Strayer
Individual Experiences
Personal anecdotes highlight the challenges of multitasking. David Strayer discusses how supertaskers, a small percentage of the population, excel at multitasking due to their brain's unique efficiency 3. Olivia Grace describes her cautious approach to multitasking while driving, preferring to focus on the road 4.
There are some people who can't walk and chew gum, they're clearly at the other end. They're anti supertaskers.
--- David Strayer
Comparative Analysis
Comparing average multitaskers to supertaskers reveals significant differences. David Strayer notes that supertaskers can process multiple streams of information efficiently, a trait that may be genetic 3. He emphasizes that most people are not good at multitasking, despite believing otherwise 5.
What it tells us about being human, for the most part, is that we're bad at multitasking, even though we think we're good at multitasking.
--- David Strayer
Real-World Implications
The myths of multitasking have real-world implications in various settings. Stephen Dubner discusses how distractions can hinder deep work and productivity 6. Gloria Mark shares her research on workplace attention dynamics, revealing how frequent task-switching impacts efficiency 7.
This distraction paralyzes the brain and murders thought.
--- Arthur Schopenhauer
Related Episodes


Your Brain Doesn’t Work the Way You Think | Freakonomics Radio
Answers 383 questions

Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses? (Update) | Freakonomics Radio
Answers 383 questions

Will Work-From-Home Work Forever? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 464
Answers 383 questions
Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 1: TV) | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 440
Answers 383 questions

The Unintended Consequences of Working From Home | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 520
Answers 383 questions602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think? | Freakonomics Radio
Answers 383 questionsWhy Are There So Many Bad Bosses? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 495
Answers 383 questions
Do Unions Still Work? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 496
Answers 383 questions

What’s Wrong with Being a One-Hit Wonder? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 530
Answers 383 questions

Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 495
Answers 383 questions
Does Philosophy Still Matter? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 512
Answers 383 questionsEXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update) | Freakonomics Radio
Answers 383 questions
Has Globalization Failed? | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 519
Answers 383 questionsDoes Advertising Actually Work? (Part 2: Digital) | Freakonomics Radio | Episode 441
Answers 383 questions













