Published Jan 11, 2017

Ep. 053: Seattle, WA. Steven Rinella talks with political communications PhD candidate Greg Blascovich and Janis Putelis from the MeatEater crew

Steven Rinella is joined by Greg Blascovich and Janis Putelis to explore the intricate connections between public lands advocacy, political polarization, and hunting's conservation impact, delving into federal vs. state land control, affective polarization in politics, and the crucial role of communication in shaping hunting perceptions.
Episode Highlights
The MeatEater Podcast logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Regulation

    Hunting regulation plays a crucial role in shaping public perception, as explains. He highlights how state fish and wildlife commissions regulate hunting through biologists who monitor populations and make decisions on hunting seasons 1. This regulatory framework often surprises non-hunters, who may not realize the complexity involved in managing wildlife sustainably. shares his experience with people who assume hunting is unregulated, emphasizing the importance of educating the public about these measures 2.

    It's heartening to see if you just present people with some facts, they will, in fact, ingest them and make a decision after that.

    ---

    Understanding these regulations can lead to more positive attitudes towards hunting, as people recognize the careful management involved.

       

    Diplomacy

    Diplomacy and public relations are vital in shaping the narrative around hunting. stresses the importance of reaching out beyond the hunting community to engage non-hunters with concepts like venison diplomacy 3. This approach involves sharing the benefits of hunting, such as sustainable food sourcing, to foster understanding and acceptance. notes that explaining how hunting prevents waste and contributes to sustainability can ease concerns among non-hunters 4.

    People generally respond favorably to hunters talking about going out and sustainably harvesting food.

    ---

    By focusing on these positive aspects, hunters can effectively communicate their values and practices to a broader audience.

       

    Tradition

    The traditional arguments for hunting, such as family heritage and cultural practices, often resonate within the hunting community but have limited impact on non-hunters. found that while tradition is a strong motivator for hunters, it does not significantly change non-hunters' attitudes 5. He notes that tradition appeals are effective in certain contexts, like fundraising within the hunting community, but less so in broader public discourse 6.

    Using the tradition argument is good in certain contexts... but it just does nothing for non-hunters.

    ---

    This highlights the need for hunters to adapt their messaging when engaging with those outside their community.

Related Episodes