Published Nov 18, 2021

Here's Why It's So Hard to Fix the Corporate Bond Market

Explore the intricate challenges of the corporate bond market through the lens of agency problems and regulatory obstacles, as former SEC Chief Economist Larry Harris delves into the political and competitive influences stifling transparency and reform efforts.
Episode Highlights
Odd Lots logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • SEC's Role

    The SEC plays a crucial role in regulating the corporate bond market, yet its efforts often face significant challenges. highlights how the SEC's Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee (FIMSAC) proposed delaying the reporting of large bond trades, a move he found regressive 1. He notes that the SEC's ability to mandate change, as seen with the successful implementation of Reg NMS in equity markets, is often hindered by political influences and vested interests 1. Harris points out that current SEC leadership under Gary Gensler has shown interest in improving price transparency, but market structure issues may not be a top priority 2.

       

    Market Politics

    Political influences and conflicts of interest significantly impact regulatory decisions in the bond market. explains that advisory committees like FIMSAC are often weighted towards those vested in the status quo, making substantial change difficult 3. He describes how dealers hold significant informational power, acting as middlemen in a system that lacks transparency 4. Harris emphasizes the challenge of overcoming these entrenched interests to improve market efficiency and transparency.

       

    Transparency Initiatives

    Efforts to increase transparency in bond trading have shown mixed results. recounts how the SEC mandated public access to bond trade prices, leading to significant savings for investors 5. However, he notes that while electronic trading venues have emerged, they still preserve some dealer power, and fundamental improvements remain elusive 6. Harris argues that despite progress, the market could be substantially better, benefiting both investors and issuers.

Related Episodes