Frances Kissling — What Is Good in the Position of the Other

Moral Complexity

Frances Kissling, a prominent figure in the abortion debate, emphasizes the complexity of moral choices surrounding abortion. She critiques the one-dimensional approach often taken by the pro-choice movement, which focuses solely on the woman's desires without considering other values, such as the inherent value of the fetus 1. Kissling appreciates the holistic perspective of those opposed to legal abortion, who advocate for a consistent ethic of life 1. She notes that the political context often strips away the nuances of these moral decisions, reducing them to binary choices of legality 2.

I think abortion decision is a conflict, valued decision. What I like about the position of people who are very strongly opposed to legal abortion is that side of that movement that really is troubled, that really does have what David calls a consistent ethic of life.

--- Frances Kissling

This reductionist view, she argues, fails to capture the intricate realities of abortion and other moral issues.

   

Evolving Views

Kissling reflects on the evolution of societal views on abortion, highlighting a significant shift around 2004. She observes that both sides of the debate have remained largely unchanged, despite the recognition that previous strategies have been ineffective 3. Kissling believes that meaningful change occurs at the margins, where individuals are willing to engage with opposing views and find common ground 4.

Ive always believed that people in the center are not going to be the big changemakers. Youve got to put yourself at the margins and be willing to risk in order to make change.

--- Frances Kissling

She advocates for approaching differences with an openness to the good in others, which she sees as crucial for progress.