Published Oct 30, 2008

[Unedited] Steven Waldman with Krista Tippett (On Liberating the Founders)

Krista Tippett and Steven Waldman delve into the intertwined histories of religion and politics in America, exploring the Founding Fathers' nuanced efforts to balance faith and governance while shedding light on the ongoing debate over church and state separation.
Episode Highlights
On Being with Krista Tippett logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Founders' Views

    The Founding Fathers held diverse and nuanced views on religion and government, challenging modern assumptions. highlights that the founders did not see separation of church and state as a marker of one's faith. Instead, they believed vibrant faiths were those that promoted morality and good behavior 1. emerges as a key figure, advocating for religious liberty as a means to encourage religion by leaving it alone, a perspective often misunderstood today 2.

    The founders who supported separation of church and state mostly did it because they wanted to promote religion, not discourage religion.

    ---

    This complexity underscores the importance of understanding the founders' intentions beyond contemporary binaries.

       

    Evangelical Role

    Evangelicals played a crucial role in shaping the separation of church and state, often aligning with figures like Madison and Jefferson. notes that evangelicals historically supported separation to protect their religious practices from persecution 3. This alliance was pivotal, as seen in Madison's political career, where evangelical support was essential for his congressional success 4.

    The best way to have a vibrant Christianity is having more separation of church and state.

    ---

    This historical context reveals the depth of evangelical influence on American religious liberty.

       

    Evolving Views

    Interpretations of the separation of church and state have evolved, reflecting ongoing debates about its implications. argues that while the founders left some areas intentionally vague, figures like Madison believed in erring on the side of separation to protect religion from state interference 5. This perspective contrasts with , who spoke of a "wall of separation," a concept that gained legal traction only in the 20th century 6.

    Whenever there's a gray area, err on the side of separation.

    ---

    These shifting interpretations highlight the dynamic nature of this foundational principle.

Related Episodes