Published Dec 14, 2023

Choosing to Induce: How a randomized trial gave birth to a new era in obstetrics

Dive into the transformative impact of the ARRIVE trial on obstetrics, as Emily Oster and Dr. Nathan Fox delve into the critical debate over labor induction at 39 weeks, balancing medical risks, historical insights, and patient preferences.
Episode Highlights
ParentData with Emily Oster logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Medical Risks

    Labor induction at 39 weeks is often considered due to the potential risks of waiting longer, such as stillbirth and gestational hypertension. explains that while these risks are rare, they are present and can influence the decision to induce labor. He emphasizes that the risk of stillbirth, although less than 1%, is a factor for some parents who prefer to minimize any potential danger by opting for induction 1.

    The outcomes for the baby are as good or better than if waiting, meaning there isn't an increased risk of prematurity or delivering before it's time.

    ---

    Emily Oster2.

       

    Patient Preferences

    Patient preferences play a crucial role in the decision to induce labor, with many opting to wait for natural labor onset. Nathan highlights that while inducing at 39 weeks is a common strategy, it is not suitable for everyone due to personal and logistical reasons 3. He stresses the importance of respecting individual choices, as some patients may have heightened anxiety due to past pregnancy experiences, influencing their decision to induce earlier 4.

    Most people will tell you what they want. Most people will show you their cards. It's not that hard.

    ---

    Emily adds that understanding and accommodating these preferences is vital, as they can significantly impact the birthing experience and outcomes.

Related Episodes