How is data manipulated in research?

Data manipulation in research can occur in various ways and for different reasons. Here are some key insights into how data can be manipulated:

1. Selection Bias and Reporting: Research data can be manipulated by selectively reporting or omitting certain results. Researchers might only publish data that supports their hypothesis while ignoring contradictory evidence. The choice between reporting absolute risk versus relative risk, for example, can significantly alter the perceived effectiveness of a treatment or intervention, ultimately misleading about the actual benefit or risk 1.

2. Funding and Publication Pressure: There can be a conflict of interest where companies fund studies that favor their products, potentially leading to biased results. Researchers motivated by publication pressures or funding incentives may manipulate data to produce more favorable results 1.

3. Statistic Manipulation (P-Hacking): Manipulating statistical analysis methods to achieve desired outcomes is another form of data manipulation. This could be by conducting numerous tests and selectively reporting those that have significant results, or by altering data collection methodologies to skew results 2.

4. Misinterpretation and Oversimplification: Results can be misrepresented or simplified in the dissemination process, such as in media reports, leading to public misunderstanding. The difference in understanding of complex statistical measures like p-values can further add to the distortion 2.

5. Manipulated Machine Learning Data: In the context of machine learning and AI, data manipulation can influence large groups, potentially affecting democratic processes or market dynamics. Manipulating large datasets can distort the training of AI systems, leading to biased or flawed outcomes 3.

   • 

     1

     Uncovering Research Manipulation

     00:40:35
     
   • 

     2

     Data Manipulation Warning

     00:06:25
   • 

     3

     Manipulation of Information

     00:33:20
     

It's important for both researchers and the public to be aware of these potential manipulations. Critical review and cross-validation by independent groups are essential practices to identify and mitigate these issues.