Nativist vs. Behaviorist

The debate between nativist and behaviorist perspectives centers on whether capabilities like language and behavior are innate or learned. The nativist view, prominently represented by Noam Chomsky, suggests that humans possess an inborn ability to develop language. This is contrasted with behaviorism, championed by B.F. Skinner, which proposes that behaviors are learned through reinforcement and punishment.

1. Behaviorist Perspective:

   • B.F. Skinner's theory of operant conditioning asserts that behaviors, including language, are learned through reinforcement (rewards and punishments) 1 2.
   • This viewpoint emphasizes that all behaviors are acquired from the environment and experiences.

2. Nativist Perspective:

   • Noam Chomsky's theory of universal grammar posits that the ability to learn language is innate, with the brain pre-wired to acquire language 2 3.
     • 

       1

       Attachment Theory Evolution

       00:24:48
     • 

       2

       Language Learning Theories

       00:10:27
     • 

       3

       Language Acquisition Debate

       00:22:11
   • Nativists believe that certain abilities are built into the human brain from birth, basing their argument on the presence of universal grammatical principles across different languages 2.

3. Comparison in Specific Contexts:

   • Attachment Theory: Nativists like John Bowlby argued that bonding and attachment are innate traits, not learned behaviors, opposing the behaviorist idea that such traits are learned through reinforcement 1.
   • Language Learning: Chomsky's concept of the "language acquisition device" suggests that children are born with the capacity to understand and form grammatical structures, countering the behaviorist view that language is learned solely through interaction and reinforcement 2 3.

4. Interactionist Perspective:

   • A middle ground, the interactionist perspective, recognizes both the innate capacity and the role of environmental interactions in developing capabilities like language. This view suggests that brain development and learning are influenced by both biological predispositions and social interactions 3.

Overall, while behaviorists attribute development to environmental conditioning, nativists emphasize biological predispositions with an innate foundation, and interactionists integrate both views to explain human learning and behavior.