Cooper vs. McLaurin
Sources:
When comparing Amari Cooper and Terry McLaurin for fantasy football, experts highlight several key points:
Terry McLaurin
- Unacknowledged Star: McLaurin is considered an underappreciated talent, known for his great separation, speed, and playmaking ability 1.
- Potential Upside: He has the potential for a breakout season similar to Stefan Diggs in 2020, but his performance is highly dependent on his quarterback situation 1.
- Consistent Performer: McLaurin has had three consecutive 1,000-yard seasons despite challenging environments and fluctuating quarterback play 2.
Amari Cooper
- Dependable Yet Limited: While Cooper had a strong season finishing as a top receiver, his performance last year with Deshaun Watson was inconsistent, showing some great games but also low outputs 3.
- Draft Position Concerns: He is often drafted around the 41-45 range, but there are concerns about his upside relative to his draft cost 3.
- Potential for Disappointment: Cooper's upside is perceived to be capped, especially within a Browns offense that remains unpredictable 3.
Key Differences
- Consistency vs. Upside: McLaurin offers less downside due to his consistent yardage but could be limited by his team's instability. Cooper, despite consistent high-level performance, carries risk due to the uncertainty around Deshaun Watson's performance.
- Draft Appeal: McLaurin might be a safer pick due to his lower ADP and consistent performance, while Cooper represents a riskier pick with a potentially lower floor but similar ceiling to lower-cost options.
Ultimately, McLaurin is viewed as a more reliable pick with potential for a breakout if his team's situation improves, whereas Cooper is seen as a higher-risk option who could underperform relative to his draft position.
RELATED QUESTIONS