How does radical subjectivism prevail?

Radical subjectivism prevails by challenging and often dismantling established notions of objective truths and universal moral standards, as discussed by various experts.

Stephen West explains how postmodernist thinkers critique Enlightenment-era assumptions about human subjectivity. These thinkers argue that instead of believing in an autonomous, free-willed subject, we should recognize how our cultural and historical contexts severely limit our thoughts and perceptions. This means that notions of a single, universal truth or morality are seen as naive and outdated, paving the way for subjectivist ideologies to dominate intellectual discourse today 1.

Ben Shapiro discusses the impact of radical subjectivism on societal moral standards. He notes that the prevalent view that there are no absolute moral truths leads to a reliance on personal feelings and subjective perspectives in making ethical decisions. This mindset affects various domains, from business practices to personal relationships, leading to a more fragmented and relativistic moral landscape 2.

Michael Ward, referencing C.S. Lewis's critique of subjectivism, highlights the dangers inherent in teaching and accepting subjective interpretations as valid as objective truths. Lewis warns that a society dominated by subjectivist thinking will face a "very shrunk and shriveled and suffocating world" because common ground between individuals is lost, and conflicting personal truths become incommensurable 3.

In essence, radical subjectivism prevails by undermining the belief in objective truths and shared values, leading to a society where personal perspective and individual experience are the primary arbiters of reality.