How do leaders navigate political games?

Leaders navigate political games in a variety of ways, often by adjusting their strategies to the specific environment they are in. Here are two key perspectives from experts:

1. Changing the Rules with a Place of Love: Tulsi Gabbard emphasizes that leaders can navigate political environments by changing the rules and approaching politics with a mindset of service and love. She explains that coming from a place of love does not equate to weakness. Instead, it empowers leaders to stand up, speak the truth, and challenge those in power who misuse their authority. This approach allows leaders to build relationships across divides, focus on common goals, and solve problems despite disagreements. She asserts that this method helps overcome hyperpartisanship and systemic issues in governance 1.

2. Navigating Power Games and Insecurities: Robert Greene discusses the common occurrence of leaders playing power games due to insecurities. He notes that leadership positions, especially at the top hierarchy, are often occupied by individuals who may not necessarily be the most deserving or capable. This discrepancy creates a sense of vulnerability and insecurity, leading leaders to engage in political games to maintain their positions. Greene highlights that the competitive nature of business and the need to juggle conflicting demands make leadership challenging, requiring leaders to demonstrate toughness while appearing virtuous and progressive 2.

These insights illustrate that navigating political games involves strategic change, ethical leadership, and dealing with inherent insecurities and competition.