Congressional Hearings Critique
Tim discusses the refusal of a committee to make testimony public, highlighting a perceived lack of transparency in congressional hearings. He critiques the legal approach to the January 6 case, arguing that the evaluation of actions depends heavily on the perspective of the president's dual roles as a candidate and commander in chief. He raises a thought-provoking question about the expectations for a leader facing credible reports of election fraud.In this clip
From this podcast
Shawn Ryan Show
Tim Parlatore - United States v. Donald J. Trump | SRS #89
Related Questions