Legal Justifications Debate
A thought-provoking discussion unfolds around the legal justifications for targeted killings, drawing parallels to past arguments on enhanced interrogation. The conversation highlights the tension between national security and civil liberties, as both speakers grapple with the implications of accepting increasingly expansive legal frameworks under different administrations. The irony of shifting perspectives based on political alignment adds depth to the ongoing debate.In this clip
From this podcast
SpyCast
15 Years Later, Part 3: An Interview with Mark Zaid and Bradley Moss
Related Questions