“Why doesn’t English have a plural you?” | Unconfuse Me with Bill Gates

Plural 'You'

In a fascinating discussion, John McWhorter explores the peculiarities of the English language, particularly its lack of a distinct plural form for "you." He explains that while languages like French have separate pronouns for singular and plural "you," English relies on context or regional adaptations like "y'all" or "you guys." McWhorter argues that "you guys" has become the de facto plural form, despite its imperfections, because it resonates with the public's subconscious preferences.

What really happens is that what becomes the right thing is what appeals tacitly and subconsciously to the most people in the public.

--- John McWhorter

He emphasizes that language evolution is driven by what naturally appeals to people, making "you guys" a practical, if flawed, solution 1.

   

Pronoun Evolution

John McWhorter also delves into the broader topic of pronoun evolution, highlighting how societal influences shape language. He notes that while "you guys" is widely used, it faces criticism for implying a male default, yet it persists due to its widespread acceptance. McWhorter suggests that creating entirely new pronouns is unlikely to succeed unless they naturally integrate into the language.

If you bring in something like kabunka or gazooka, nobody's going to take it up. It has to be native, and they is already busy.

--- John McWhorter

This underscores the organic nature of language change, where practicality often trumps idealism 1.