Published Sep 11, 2023

‘Winning Time’ and Its History Problem, Plus ‘Drops of God’

Chris Ryan and Andy Greenwald delve into the narrative challenges of 'Winning Time,' exploring the balance between historical accuracy and compelling storytelling, while reflecting on the cultural significance of sports dramas and the NFL. They also dive into 'Drops of God,' analyzing its innovative approach to integrating wine and international perspectives into storytelling.
Episode Highlights
The Watch logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Historical Accuracy

    The series "Winning Time" faces criticism for its strict adherence to historical accuracy, which some argue hinders its storytelling potential. and discuss how the show's focus on historical events, like the portrayal of the Celtics, limits its narrative scope and reduces its entertainment value 1. Andy suggests that early creative decisions, such as focusing on the Lakers like "The Crown" does with the British monarchy, could have provided a more engaging narrative framework 2.

    The Celtics are the villains in most of my life in almost any context.

    ---

    This approach might have allowed the series to transcend its "easily Wikipedia-ed parts," offering a richer exploration of the NBA's cultural and racial dynamics.

       

    Characterization Issues

    Character portrayal in "Winning Time" is another point of contention, particularly in balancing historical figures with narrative development. Andy criticizes the simplistic depiction of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, arguing that it undermines the complexity of his character and the show's potential for depth 3. He notes that the series often sacrifices nuanced storytelling for historical milestones, which can be frustrating for viewers seeking a more layered narrative 4.

    It's insulting as an entertainment for us.

    ---

    This approach risks alienating audiences who expect a more sophisticated portrayal of legendary figures.

       

    Narrative Structure

    The narrative structure of "Winning Time" is critiqued for its pacing and time jumps, which some feel disrupt the storytelling flow. Chris and Andy highlight how the series' rapid time jumps, such as skipping a year and a half, can leave character development stagnant and the storyline disjointed 5. This approach, they argue, detracts from the show's potential to offer a comprehensive view of the Lakers' journey 6.

    It should have been something that was conceived of as a decade spanning series.

    ---

    The hosts suggest that a more consistent narrative pace could enhance the show's ability to engage viewers and provide a deeper understanding of its characters.

Related Episodes