Hate Speech Dilemma
David argues that attempts to define and limit hate speech often lead to an unmanageable expansion of categories, making it nearly impossible to enforce. He highlights the historical context of the student movement's no platform motions, illustrating how the desire to ban hate speech can inadvertently target widespread societal views. The distinction between harmful speech and fascism lies in the latter's endorsement of violence, which poses a direct threat to individuals' safety.In this clip
From this podcast
Within Reason
"No Free Speech for Fascists" | A Lawyer's Case for No-Platforming
Related Questions