Is vs. Ought
The discussion delves into the philosophical distinction between "is" and "ought," highlighting the lack of historical precedent for deriving moral obligations from factual statements. While past experiences can suggest a connection between what is and what will be, no equivalent link exists for moral imperatives. The conversation emphasizes the uncertainty surrounding moral reasoning compared to the more reliable nature of inductive reasoning in predicting future events.In this clip
From this podcast
Within Reason
We Agree Now! | Rationality Rules & Cosmic Skeptic | Is Morality Objective?
Related Questions