Published May 24, 2020

Should Vegans Just SHUT UP? | Joey Carbstrong

Animal rights activist Joey Carbstrong shares his transformation story and delves into the complexities of vegan advocacy, examining the ethics of animal versus human rights and the importance of strategic communication in promoting ethical veganism across diverse audiences.
Episode Highlights
Within Reason logo

Popular Clips

Episode Highlights

  • Moral Comparisons

    Joey Carbstrong and explore the moral comparisons between animal rights and historical human rights issues. Joey emphasizes the importance of focusing on the actions, such as enslavement and murder, rather than comparing victims directly, which can lead to misunderstandings 1. Alex adds that the mentality used to justify animal exploitation is similar to that used in past human rights abuses, highlighting that intelligence should not determine moral worth 2. Joey further compares speciesism to other forms of discrimination, suggesting that the underlying mentality is equally dangerous 3.

    The issue of morality needs to be the same there. I think that's a, that's a good takeaway from what you've said.

    ---

       

    Consumer Responsibility

    The discussion shifts to the moral responsibilities of consumers in the context of animal exploitation. Joey argues that consumers play a crucial role in perpetuating these industries by creating demand, which in turn drives the actions of farmers and slaughterhouse workers 4. Alex proposes a thought experiment where a vegan takes a job in the industry to mitigate harm, questioning whether the blame should lie more with consumers than producers 5. Joey maintains that while both parties are culpable, consumers hold greater responsibility due to their power to change demand 6.

    I try to do a bit of both, but as an advocate trying to persuade people to change, I'm more so doing it on the consumer.

    ---

       

    Moral Responsibility

    Joey and Alex delve into our moral obligations towards animals, given our advanced capabilities. Joey argues that our intelligence should compel us to protect vulnerable beings rather than exploit them, drawing parallels with marginalized human groups who are afforded rights despite their vulnerabilities 7. Alex emphasizes that our higher moral capacity should lead us to advocate for animals, as they cannot speak for themselves 8. Joey concludes by comparing the mentality used to oppress animals to that used in other forms of discrimination, urging for a shift towards equality and compassion 9.

    That was very beautifully said, Alex, amazingly said.

    ---

Related Episodes