Is anti-bias training effective?

The effectiveness of anti-bias training is a complex and debated issue with varying opinions among experts.

1. Support for Anti-Bias Training:

   • Jessica Nordell highlights a robust program developed at the University of Wisconsin by Patricia Devine. This training boosts awareness, increases motivation, and provides strategies to combat bias, showing effectiveness even years later. For instance, it led to changed behaviors such as speaking up against discrimination and hiring more women in science and math departments 1 2.
   • Adam Grant emphasizes that training focusing on behavior change rather than just raising awareness can be effective. He notes that habit-based approaches, treating bias as a habit to break, yielded positive results, such as increased hiring of women in STEM fields at a university 3.
     • 

       1

       Bias Training Impact

       00:40:46
     • 

       2

       Transforming Bias

       00:39:31
     • 

       3

       Breaking Bias Habits

       00:06:28
     • 

       4

       Starbucks Unconscious Bias

       00:35:47
     • 

       5

       Bias Training Failures

       00:03:15
     • 

       6

       Implicit Bias Training

       00:15:45
     • 

       7

       Rethinking Bias Training

       00:15:25

2. Criticism and Challenges:

   • Ben Shapiro argues that unconscious bias training, like Starbucks' effort, is flawed. He maintains that such training may not correlate with actual behavior changes and could even backfire, making people more defensive or less cooperative 4.
   • Adam Grant also points out that hundreds of experiments suggest bias training often fails and can sometimes harm. After mandated training, some firms saw a decrease in promotions for black women and Asian Americans, possibly due to increased defensiveness or a sense of futility among participants 5.
   • Brian Nosek critiques the over-reliance on implicit bias training. He suggests that while education about bias is valuable, it is not sufficient to change behavior. Effective solutions require structural changes in organizational decision-making processes 6.

3. Alternative Approaches:

   • Paula Caligiuri criticizes bias training for potentially stifling natural, authentic conversations that could bridge differences. She advocates for focusing on conversational skills to foster genuine connections and understanding rather than simply labeling thoughts as biases 7.

In summary, while some programs show promise in raising awareness and changing behaviors, especially when integrated with comprehensive strategies and ongoing reinforcement, others are criticized for their ineffectiveness and potential to backfire. Sustainable change often requires deeper structural adjustments and continuous effort beyond initial training sessions.