Published Apr 11, 2024

s4/e13 Double Threshold Training, aka "The Norwegian Method" with Dr. Phil Batterson, MS, PhD

Elisabeth Scott and Dr. Phil Batterson explore the innovative Double Threshold Training method, known as the Norwegian Method, emphasizing its impact on elite athletic endurance while uncovering the complexities of lactate thresholds and heart rate monitoring in optimizing performance.
Episode Highlights
The Running Explained Podcast logo

Popular Clips

Questions from this episode

Episode Highlights

  • Heart Rate Value

    Monitoring heart rate is a crucial aspect of effective training, offering insights beyond pace and external markers. emphasizes the value of heart rate as an accessible tool for runners, noting that it reflects the body's internal state, which can vary daily 1. Phil Batterson suggests using heart rate zones, particularly for easier pacing, to account for factors like dehydration or incomplete recovery 1. He advises runners to focus on heart rate rather than pace to prevent unnecessary fatigue and optimize training outcomes 2.

    It's okay to go a little bit slower. If they were wearing a heart rate monitor, I would say you're not allowed to go above this heart rate because you're not doing yourself much good by going above it and trying to run faster.

    --- Phil Batterson

    This approach helps manage fatigue and enhances performance during high-intensity workouts.

       

    Workout Integration

    Integrating heart rate data into daily training routines can significantly enhance performance outcomes. Phil Batterson explains that elite athletes like Jakob Ingebritsen use heart rate and lactate levels to fine-tune their training, ensuring internal stress is managed while maximizing mechanical output 3. This method allows athletes to push their physiological limits safely, leading to faster running speeds without overexertion. highlights that while elite athletes have sophisticated tools, the principle of balancing physiological and performance metrics is applicable to all runners 4.

    The ability for these really high level athletes to understand exactly what pace they're running, like, down to the second per mile, to understand kind of where to really judge what things are supposed to feel like, if it's normal, it's not.

    ---

    This integration helps runners optimize their training by focusing on both internal and external performance indicators.

       

    Monitoring Limits

    While heart rate monitors are valuable, they come with limitations that athletes must consider. Phil Batterson advises consistency in testing protocols to minimize errors and enhance accuracy 5. He acknowledges the accessibility of wrist-based heart rate monitors but warns of their potential inaccuracy, suggesting that more precise physiological testing is still needed for optimal performance 6. notes that while technology is advancing, the current tools may not yet meet the accuracy required for all athletes 6.

    The risk-based heart rate monitors are garbage, but the remote physiology testing, I think, is getting very close to the lab-based stuff, and it's not like, crazy inaccurate.

    --- Phil Batterson

    As technology evolves, the accuracy and accessibility of these tools are expected to improve, offering better support for athletes.

Related Episodes